Polyethylene glycol (PEG) is one of the most versatile tools in pharmaceutics and biomedicine, combining high biocompatibility with a wide range of functional capabilities. The demand for PEG and its derivatives is steadily increasing due to the dynamic expansion of the biotechnology drug market and the development of personalized and targeted therapies.
The paper considers the physicochemical properties of PEG and presents the systemized derivatives of the polymer. Particular attention is paid to the technology of protein PEGylation: the modification methods are analyzed, and the study demonstrates how this process alters the therapeutic and pharmacodynamic profiles of biopharmaceuticals.
The review highlights the key areas of PEG application: fr om traditional use as a solvent and an excipient to cutting-edge solutions in targeted drug delivery and polymer matrices for regenerative medicine. An important part of the work is the analysis of the regulatory aspects governing the distribution of PEG-modified drugs, both within the international legal framework and within the Russian Federation.
PEG is a revolutionary medical tool of the XXI century. In the modern paradigm, it is viewed not as a mere excipient but as a multifunctional, high-tech agent with proven clinical efficacy that provides an innovative approach to solving medical challenges.
Introduction
The modern biotechnology industry continually faces a range of challenges and limitations associated with the low stability in physiological environments, high renal clearance, and strong immunogenicity of many therapeutic proteins, peptides, and nanoparticles — drug carriers. Among many synthetic polymers developed to overcome these limitations, polyethylene glycol (PEG) holds a particularly important place [1]. The global PEG market was valued at $5.9 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow from $6.2 billion in 2026 to $9.3 billion by 2033, representing a compound annual growth rate of 6.0%. In 2025, the medical segment dominated the market accounting for more than 40% of total revenue. The demand for pharmaceutical PEG, particularly for drug formulations, biopharmaceuticals, and drug-delivery systems, is increasing; it is due to rising investments in biopharmaceutical research and manufacturing [2]. PEG ability to enhance solubility, bioavailability and to stabilize drug formulations makes it an indispensable compound in the production of oral, topical, and injectable medications. In addition, the development of personalized medicine and biologics manufacturing has increased attention to drug-delivery systems, further fueling demand for PEG. Since investments in research and development — particularly, in biologics and biopharmaceutics — continues to grow, the need for PEG as an excipient is also expected to increase [3].
PEG is known to possess numerous unique properties: it increases the solubility of hydrophobic drugs, improves compound stability, and prolongs the half-life of drugs in the body [4]. PEG can function as a steric shield preventing the immune system from recognizing therapeutic agents, thereby making them more difficult to identify and eliminate [5]. Due to its ability to form flexible and biocompatible cross-linked structures, PEG is widely used to create hydrogels, which serve as scaffolds for regenerative medicine [6] (Figure 1). PEG is also used as a coating for implantable medical devices to reduce protein adsorption and cell adhesion to the material surface [7].

Figure 1. Applications of polyethylene glycol (PEG) in biotechnologies and medicine
PEG is known to combine numerous exceptional properties, including high hydrophilicity, flexibility of its polyether chain, and low toxicity, making the polymer the “gold standard” in the field of bioconjugation [8]. Since the approval of the first commercial drugs developed through the PEGylation of therapeutic proteins, this technology has formed the basis of dozens of medications, including PEGylated interferons and liposomal formulations of doxorubicin [9, 10]. Given the extensive use of PEG across various areas of medicine, the information about it remains highly fragmented. The present review summarizes the current understanding of the relationship between PEG chemical structure and its effects on the pharmacodynamic profiles of therapeutic proteins, peptides, drug delivery systems, and tissue-engineered constructs, as well as their behavior in biological systems. In addition, the work considered the aspects of PEG classification and the regulatory framework governing PEGylated drugs.
The literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and eLIBRARY.RU databases by the following key words: polyethylene glycol, PEGylation, biomedicine, pharmaceutics, and proteins.
Physicochemical properties of polyethylene glycol and its derivatives
Chemical structure of polyethylene glycol
Synthetic water-soluble polymers, including PEG, are widely used in medicine and various industries [11]. Conventionally, each PEG type is designated by a number indicating the polymer average molecular weight. The simplest and most common PEG structures are linear polyethers with two hydroxyl groups at their ends, having the formula HO–(CH2–CH2–O)n–H. The “n” value indicates the number of repeating oxyethylene groups in the molecule (Figure 2) [12]. Ethylene oxide polymerization to produce PEG can be carried out using various methods, including anionic, cationic, and coordination polymerization [13].

Figure 2. Chemical structure of polyethylene glycol (PEG) (adapted from [12] with changes). mPEG — monomethoxy-PEG
Anionic polymerization is the most common method for PEG synthesis because it enables control precisely over the molecular weight and the end-group functionality of the resulting polymer. The synthesis proceeds through the ring-opening polymerization of an epoxide (cyclic) ring of ethylene oxide resulting in Gaussian distribution of PEG with different dispersity and chain length. One of the approaches to producing monodisperse PEG is the chromatographic purification of dispersed PEG. For example, low-pressure displacement chromatography is used to improve the uniformity of low-molecular-weight PEG, enabling to achieve a highly pure polymer with the desired chain length [13, 14].
Since the repeating ethylene oxide units of PEG lack reactive groups, PEG is conjugated to other compounds through terminal functional groups to activate the compound. The terminal PEG groups serve as functional groups in chemical modification reactions; however, their reactivity is relatively low, necessitating the activation of the end groups for the modification of therapeutic proteins and peptides [15]. Monomethoxy-PEG (mPEG) is commonly used for this purpose. Its formula can be represented as CH3O–(CH2–CH2–O)n–H. mPEG is produced by blocking one of the hydroxyl ends of PEG with a methyl group to prevent cross-linking and agglomeration with therapeutic proteins and peptides during the modification process [15, 16].
In turn, PEG with various end groups can be obtained using appropriate initiators and/or chain-terminating reagents. Thus, a wide range of functional groups can be introduced as PEG end groups including, for example, heterobifunctional products [17, 18]. The unique PEG ability to dissolve in both aqueous solutions and organic solvents makes it suitable for end-group derivatization and chemical conjugation with biological molecules under mild physiological conditions. The studies on PEG in solutions showed this polymer typically to bind 2–3 water molecules per ethylene oxide unit. Due to its highly flexible backbone and its ability to bind water molecules, a PEG molecule behaves as though it were 5–10 times larger than a soluble protein of the comparable molecular weight. This property is precisely why PEG is used to increase the solubility of hydrophobic drugs. PEGylation has no substantial effect on the structural features of a protein, however, it affects its physicochemical properties, including thermal stability [19–22]. PEG can precipitate proteins, exclude proteins from cell surfaces, reduce immunogenicity and antigenicity, and prevent the degradation of compounds caused by mammalian cells and enzymes [23].
Classification of polyethylene glycol derivatives
PEG classification based on molecular weight. PEGs differ in their properties depending on the chain length, compound structure, and molecular weight [24, 25]. Low-molecular-weight PEG (<3500 Da) is often used in pharmaceutics as an excipient or as a component of liposomes/micelles [26]. High-molecular-weight PEG (>5000 Da) is typically used to create complex therapeutic protein constructs. Such polymers may have either linear or branched structure and may be attached to protein molecules in various conformations [10, 27]. The properties of PEGylated proteins also depend, among other factors, on the molecular weight of the PEG moiety. The greater the molecular weight of PEG, the longer the compound half-life and the longer the stability of the modified protein molecule. PEG has low toxicity and is largely not involved in the body metabolic processes. PEG is partially excreted by the kidneys; however, as molecular weight increases, renal elimination decreases, while larger polymers are primarily excreted through the bile [28, 29].
Structure-based PEG classification. The pharmacokinetic profile of a PEGylated protein depends not only on its molecular weight but also on the PEG structure. Moreover, molecular weight and structure are interrelated: molecular weight of linear PEGs typically range from 2 to 40 kDa, whereas branched PEGs generally have higher molecular weight [29]. Depending on its structural conformation, PEGylation can extend the residence time of proteins in the body to varying degrees by protecting them from enzymatic degradation or the recognition by the immune system [24, 30].
Linear PEGs can be either monofunctional or bifunctional. Monofunctional PEGs include methoxy-PEGs as well as active monofunctional PEGs (N-hydroxysuccinimide, maleimides, azides, and others), and their peculiarity is that they contain reactive marks that enable directed binding of a protein molecule at a certain site. Bifunctional PEGs include hetero- and homo-bifunctional PEGs, which are frequently used for the PEGylation of peptides, proteins, and siRNA; the modification of other small molecules; and the development of drug-delivery systems (e.g., nanoparticles). Bifunctional PEGs are polymers with two available sites for protein conjugation, and can therefore be conjugated to two biomolecules. Compared with the original formulation, bifunctional PEGs can substantially increase the viscosity of the final drug product, since a single reactive PEG molecule can conjugate with two different protein molecules resulting in protein cross-linking and hydrogel formation [31]. Branched PEGs are also classified as monofunctional and bifunctional according to their functionality. However, branched PEGs differ substantially in structure. Whereas linear PEGs consist of a single polymer chain, branched PEGs have a central core from which several polymer chains extending. The classification of these PEGs according to their geometry is somewhat conventional; however, the reports in literature most commonly distinguish among Y-shaped, branched, and multi-arm PEGs [32]. Multi-arm PEGs are star-like structures bearing multiple hydroxyl or functional groups, which increase the number of active sites and the molecular weight [33]. The studies of multi-arm and Y-shaped PEGs in protein complexes are limited due to the difficulties involved in analyzing protein cross-linking processes [18, 23]. Nevertheless, multi-arm and Y-shaped PEGs have been extensively studied for the conjugation of small-molecule drugs, such as NKTR-102 (PEG-irinotecan) [34], EZN-2208 (PEG-SN38) [35], and NKTR-214 (PEG-aldesleukin) [36], which are examples of PEGylated drugs that have entered clinical trials. Such PEGs are characterized by a high density of functional end groups. Their distinctive architecture makes branched PEGs particularly effective for constructing highly interconnected polymer networks to form hydrogels [37].
PEG generations. With the development of biotechnology, PEG derivatives have been divided into three distinct generations (see the Table). First-generation, low-molecular-weight PEG derivatives primarily formed bonds with the amino groups of therapeutic proteins and peptides. Significant examples of first-generation derivatives include PEG succinimide carbonate (PEG-SC), PEG benzotriazole carbonate (PEG-BTC), PEG dichlorotriazine, PEG tresylate, PEG p-nitrophenyl carbonate, and PEG trichlorophen. PEG-SC and PEG-BTC are widely used for therapeutic protein modification, since they selectively react with lysine residues within protein molecules, thereby forming carbamates [38, 39]. However, first-generation PEG derivatives often exhibit weak interactions during protein conjugation. As a result, several problems may arise, including the formation of multiple side-reaction and degradation products, as well as the difficulties in separating the modified products. In addition, these derivatives exhibit low stability, high toxicity, and insufficient homogeneity [20].
Characteristics of polyethylene glycol (PEG) generations
|
PEG characteristics |
PEG generation | ||
|
1st |
2nd |
3rd |
|
|
Structure |
Linear |
Linear/branched |
Branched |
|
Molecular weight |
≤12 kDa |
20–40 kDa |
20–40 kDa |
|
Selectivity |
Random, nonspecific binding |
Specific binding to certain groups |
Specific binding to particular sites accounting for the exact spatial location of the binding site |
|
Impurities and dispersity |
A great number of impurities, high polydispersity |
A small number of impurities, high polydispersity |
No impurities, high monodispersity |
|
Groups to be functionalized |
Nonspecific activation of terminal hydroxyl groups. The activation is based on simple acylation or alkylation methods to target amino groups (e.g., lysine residues or N-terminal groups) |
Specific activation of thiol groups (cysteine residues), aldehyde and ketone groups (hydrazide and amine derivatives), and specific, controlled modification of lysine residues. Heterobifunctional PEGs are introduced to bind two different sites |
Activation occurs through specific targeting and attachment to sites resulting in the functional release of drugs. The key distinguishing feature is the stability of the conjugates in the bloodstream and the release of the functional molecule in response to a specific environment (e.g., a tumor). Examples include short peptides released exclusively by intracellular lysosomal enzymes; pH-sensitive conjugates that release the therapeutic compound under acidic conditions (pH 5.0–6.0); and redox-sensitive disulfide groups that are cleaved inside cells in the presence of high glutathione concentrations |
|
Functional outcome of PEGylation for a biotechnology product |
Increased drug half-life in the bloodstream, reduced immunogenicity, and improved water solubility of drugs |
Site-specific binding, reduced immunogenicity through the formation of a “hydrophilic shield”, increased drug half-life in the bloodstream, and reduced renal clearance |
Preservation of the drug full bioactivity, enhanced protection of the drug from the immune system, site-specific binding, and uniformity of the resulting conjugates due to PEG monodispersity |
Unlike first-generation PEG derivatives, second-generation PEG derivatives use more effective functional groups — aldehydes, esters, and amides — providing more specific and functional chemical modifications. The first second-generation PEG derivative to be discovered was PEG-aldehyde, which has specific properties for modifying the N-terminal amino group of polypeptides. Second-generation PEG derivatives can also perform targeted modification of sulfhydryl groups. Commonly used sulfhydryl-modified PEG derivatives include PEG-maleimide (MAL-PEG), PEG-vinyl sulfone (VS-PEG), and others.
Third-generation PEG derivatives have branched molecular structures. Branched PEG modifications are capable of the site-specific attachment of nanobodies, such as tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) using branched and Y-shaped PEG. Y-shaped and branched PEG are frequently used in advanced development of TNF-α conjugates. One of the advantages of these structures is their strong shielding effect, which protects the protein from enzymatic degradation and reduces immunogenicity while maintaining a high level of specific activity [16, 23, 40].
PEGylation of proteins
The impact of PEGylation on the pharmacodynamic profile of therapeutic proteins
The interest of biopharmaceutical industry in therapeutic proteins has grown steadily over the past several decades driven by significant advances in genetic engineering. Modern therapeutic proteins have demonstrated high specificity and biological activity. However, despite their numerous undeniable advantages, such proteins are often poorly soluble, unstable, and rapidly cleared from the body. Their outstanding pharmacodynamic profiles are frequently accompanied by poor pharmacokinetic properties, which significantly reduce their therapeutic efficacy [41, 42].
PEGylation is the primary method used to extend the half-life of proteins by protecting them from the body metabolic processes, while having no significant effect on the pharmacodynamic properties of therapeutic proteins [43, 44]. PEGylation can improve the pharmacokinetic properties of therapeutic proteins by extending their circulation time in the body, thereby prolonging the drug therapeutic effect and improving the patient living experience by reducing drug administration frequency.
Protein amino groups have been traditionally used as the primary targets for PEGylation, with acylation or alkylation reactions employed for their modification. However, alternative approaches are becoming increasingly common in modern practice, including PEG attached to thiol, hydroxyl, or amide groups. Specialized chemical or enzymatic methods are used for this purpose.
It should be noted that since regulatory authorities impose strict quality requirements on pharmaceutical products, researchers must thoroughly characterize the resulting conjugates and confirm their purity in accordance with established specifications [45, 46]. Accordingly, general strategies for improving PEGylation selectivity are being actively developed and studied.
Characteristics of therapeutic protein PEGylation
N-terminal PEGylation and lysine PEGylation. PEG is synthesized by the ring-opening polymerization of monomeric ethylene oxide. Water or methanol may serve as an initiator of the polymerization reaction. Initiation with water results in the formation of bifunctional polymer chains. When methanol is used as an initiator, monofunctional PEG is produced. Monofunctional PEG is often preferred for protein conjugation, since it prevents a single polymer chain from linking two proteins [8, 47]. Mono-methoxylated PEG produced by initiation with methanol is typically used as the starting material and functionalized for protein PEGylation. However, a certain amount of dihydroxyl PEG (a bifunctional polymer) is always present in mPEG, resulting in undesirable cross-linking of the reaction products. The diols can be removed by converting the hydroxyl group into a carboxylic acid followed by separating the products using ion-exchange chromatography [48].
For protein conjugation, mPEG is functionalized through its free terminal hydroxyl group. The active moiety is selected according to the reactive groups available on the protein. Commonly used reactive groups include N-terminal amino groups; the C-terminal carboxylic acid; and the residues of lysine, cysteine, serine, threonine, histidine, arginine, glutamic acid, and aspartic acid [44, 49, 50]. Since lysine is one of the most common amino acids in protein sequences, many PEG derivatives have been modified for the corresponding amino groups. Most PEG reagents are designed for amine conjugation, more specifically — for the ε-amino groups of lysine residues. Active esters produced by reacting PEG carboxylic acid with N-hydroxysuccinimide to form succinimidyl-activated esters are the most commonly used acylating agents for protein PEGylation. These esters react with primary amines to form amide bonds. Due to numerous lysine residues in protein amino acid sequences, the initial PEGylation of amines inevitably results in complex mixtures with different degrees of PEGylation. Moreover, improved selectivity can be achieved depending on the reaction conditions (temperature, pH, PEG-to-protein ratio, and reaction time), although such “random” PEGylation invariably leads to the formation of several positional isomers [47].
Nevertheless, nonspecific PEGylation has already proven its efficacy in improving the pharmaceutical properties of therapeutic proteins, promoting the commercialization of PEGylated drugs. For example, Pegasys (F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd., Switzerland) used to treat hepatitis C infection, is produced by nonspecific PEGylation of interferon α-2a with branched 40-kDa succinimidyl PEG [51]. The PEGylation reaction product of interferon α-2a typically contains 45–50% mono-PEGylated protein, approximately 5% poly-PEGylated protein, with the remainder consisting of unreacted protein. The antiviral activity of the conjugated protein was less than 1/10 of the native protein; however, this was largely offset by the increased residence time of the PEGylated drug in the bloodstream, which was up to 20 times longer than that of the native protein [43].
In recent years, there has been a clear trend toward more precise control over the structure of PEGylated therapeutic proteins. Numerous PEG-specific modifications have been developed, and new approaches to the PEGylation of therapeutic protein molecules have been suggested.
Cysteine (thiol) PEGylation. Cysteine PEGylation has demonstrated its efficiency in modifying enzymes and monoclonal antibodies to improve the targeting of tumor cells [52, 53]. The method is based on the specific properties of maleimide. In this case, thiol groups react with PEG-maleimide in neutral or slightly alkaline buffers, forming stable thioether bonds. Site-specific modification of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) provided the prolonged biological activity of the compound in a neutropenia model in mice. Interestingly, high-molecular-weight PEG was associated with enhanced leukocyte proliferation [54]. PEGylation significantly increases the circulating half-life of G-CSF compared with its native form, and the half-life of PEGylated proteins prolongs with the growing molecular weight of PEG [55]. In addition to G-CSF, thiol PEGylation has been used to conjugate the enzyme L-asparaginase, which is used to treat leukemia. PEGylation increased the hydrodynamic radius of the enzyme, thereby reducing its glomerular filtration rate. Moreover, the conjugation of L-asparaginase with PEG stabilized the enzyme active site and enhanced its catalytic activity [56].
Carboxyl PEGylation. The compounds PEGylated using the carboxyl method demonstrate increased solubility and reduced immunogenicity. Carboxyl PEGylation specifically targets the residues of aspartic and glutamic acids in the presence of 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide (EDC). Initially, COOH group in the protein is activated by EDC converting the carboxyl group into a reactive O-acylisourea form that facilitates its reaction with the primary amino groups of PEG [57]. Carboxyl PEGylation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), which is essential for neuronal survival, growth, and differentiation, improved the peptide pharmacokinetic properties and reduced its plasma and hepatic clearance. An increase in the renal clearance of BDNF-PEG2000 compared with unPEGylated BDNF was also reported, which was attributed to the improved cationic properties of the PEGylated peptide. In contrast, BDNF-PEG5000 showed reduced elimination from the body, highlighting the important role of PEG molecular weight in drug development [58].
PEGylation is a powerful tool for creating new protein therapeutics resulting from its ability to extend half-life, improve solubility, and reduce the rate of degradation and elimination of PEGylated proteins from the body. However, PEGylation can negatively affect a protein active site or overall structure and can also alter its bioactivity; therefore, selecting an appropriate modification method is essential for preserving protein functionality [18, 59, 60].
Polyethylene glycol as a solvent and functional excipient in pharmaceutics
In pharmaceutics, PEG can be compared to a “universal assistant” that optimizes the properties of other substances by helping them mix better, dissolve, or acquire the desired consistency.
The key value of PEG lies in its ability to increase the solubility of active pharmaceutical ingredients and drug products, thereby improving their absorption by the body. This property of PEG is of particular importance for compounds classified under the Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS), which categorizes substances according to their aqueous solubility and permeability to the intestinal wall, as Class II (low solubility, high intestinal permeability) and Class IV (low solubility, low intestinal permeability) [61]. PEG helps solve this issue in several ways.
First, PEG acts as a cosolvent: due to its polarity, it reduces the overall polarity of the solvent–drug system and facilitates the dissolution of hydrophobic molecules. Liquid PEGs (e.g., PEG 200–600) are used in oral and parenteral dosage forms. Notably, PEG 300 and PEG 400 are approved to be used in parenteral formulations at concentrations of up to 30% v/v [62].
Second, PEG participates in micellar solubilization. During micelle formation, the hydrophobic drug is retained in the core, while the hydrophilic PEG shell ensures solubility in an aqueous medium. Currently, PEG copolymers with such hydrophobic polymers as PLGA, PCL, and others are considered particularly promising. These copolymers self-assemble into nanoscale core–shell structures capable of solubilizing not only small molecules but also proteins and peptides. For example, Genexol-PM (Samyang Pharmaceuticals, South Korea) is a clinically approved nanoparticulate chemotherapeutic drug with a controlled release profile — it is a polymeric micellar composition of paclitaxel and PEG. The drug is approved in South Korea to treat breast cancer, it contains mPEG-PDLLA block copolymer (polyethylene glycol monomethyl ether — poly(D,L-lactide) block polymer) and paclitaxel, which is “hidden” within the hydrophobic core of the micelles [63].
Third, PEG is used in solid dispersions, which consist of a hydrophilic matrix containing the active ingredient dispersed at the molecular level and incorporated into a carrier — in this case, PEG. The use of PEG increases the bioavailability of drugs in solid dispersions. For example, metronidazole solubility in a solid dispersion increases by 14–17% compared with the initial substance. In this case, PEG with a molecular weight of 1500 g/mol is used, and the optimal component ratio in the solid dispersion (metronidazole:PEG) is the mass ratio of 1:1 [64]. There are the examples of commercially available pharmaceutical products based on solid-dispersion technology. For instance, Fenoglide (Salix, USA) (its active ingredient fenofibrate belongs to Class IV according to BCS) and Nimotop (Bayer, Germany) (its active ingredient nimodipine belongs to Class II according to BCS) contain PEG as a carrier [65].
PEG is known to help stabilize the drug formulations and extend their shelf life. Equally important is its role in creating the desired texture and consistency of the finished product — this is crucial for the ease of use and predictable dosing. The molecular weight, chain length, and chemical composition of PEG terminal groups affect its solubility, hygroscopicity, compatibility, and miscibility with other excipients and active pharmaceutical ingredients [4]. For example, PEG chain mobility increases as molecular weight decreases; therefore, low-molecular-weight PEGs can be used as plasticizers in solid dispersions and film coatings, increasing the flexibility of tablets and preventing their brittleness. In contrast, high-molecular-weight PEGs are crystalline substances, which can act as matrix-forming agents, reducing the dissolution rate, and they can be used in extended-release systems. Thus, combining PEGs with different molecular weights enables to control drug-release kinetics [66].
This polymer is incorporated into a variety of dosage forms ranging from liquid injectable solutions and suspensions to thick creams and ointments. It is used in injectable formulations, solutions, solid and effervescent tablets, capsules, sublingual tablets, oils, lotions, gels, and ointments. D’Souza and Shegokar summarizing the data on known PEG-based preparations [62] showed the applications of this polymer to depend on its average molecular weigh. Low-molecular-weight PEGs are primarily colorless, viscous liquids used in injections, suspensions, and solutions, whereas high-molecular-weight PEGs are primarily solid, waxy substances widely used in tablets, capsules, and suppositories.
Due to the incorporation of PEG into drug formulations, the active ingredients are absorbed more effectively, resulting in a more pronounced therapeutic effect. In oncology, for example, PEG enables more precise delivery of a drug to tumor tissues: it helps keep the drug in the bloodstream longer and reduces its toxic effects on healthy cells. This property of PEG is used in targeted drug delivery, which will be discussed in greater detail in the following section.
Polyethylene glycol as a component of a targeted drug delivery system
As a key component of modern drug delivery systems, PEG forms a protective barrier around the active substance and prevents its premature degradation in the body, thereby prolonging its action. In this context, the primary function of PEG is to create a hydrophilic, hydrated shell around a hydrophobic core. This shell serves several functions at once: it stabilizes the dispersion, masks the particles from the immune system, and enables targeted drug delivery. The best-known effect of PEG is referred to as the “stealth effect” [62, 67]. In general, the reticuloendothelial system rapidly recognizes and removes foreign particles from the bloodstream. A PEG shell prevents this process by forming a dense, hydrophilic “protective” layer, reducing the surface charge density, and thereby masking the particle shape and surface creating steric repulsion, and reducing protein adsorption. As a result, drugs circulate in the blood longer, and are accumulated more effectively in target tissues (e.g., in tumors, due to the enhanced permeability and retention effect). Drug delivery systems may include PEGylated nanoparticles, liposomes, proteins, enzymes, small-molecule drugs, polyelectrolytes, and others [68].
Liposomes are among the most extensively studied carriers used in targeted drug delivery systems. Liposomes are spherical lipid vesicles (typically 50–500 nm in diameter) consisting of one or more lipid bilayers. Liposomes are resulted from the emulsification of natural or synthetic lipids in an aqueous medium [69]. The main advantage of liposomes is their ability to encapsulate a wide range of substances with virtually no restrictions regarding their chemical nature, molecular size, and properties providing a unique tool for addressing numerous medical challenges [70]. The only problem in using conventional liposomes in vivo is that they readily adsorb opsonin molecules onto their surface. It leads to the recognition and uptake of liposomes by the reticuloendothelial system cells followed by their rapid removal from the bloodstream. To prevent rapid recognition by the reticuloendothelial system, liposome surfaces are modified with hydrophilic polymers such as PEG. This modification reduces interactions with serum opsonins and increases the circulation time of liposomes in the bloodstream. For example, the study by Jyothirmayi et al. [71] showed increasing the proportion of PEG on the liposome surface to 4–10% to result in a substantial increase in in vivo circulation time — from 200 to 1000 min. The development and study of PEG-coated liposomes have demonstrated their strong potential for clinical applications [70]. Doxorubicin, for example, is one of the most extensively studied drugs delivered by PEGylated liposomes. The PEG coating not only protects liposomes from phagocytosis but also substantially increases the encapsulation efficiency, which reached 98% in some studies. In the study by Minamisakamoto et al. [72], spherical liposomes were coated with PEG-DSPE to deliver doxorubicin in vivo. In that case, PEG acted as a stabilizer for doxorubicin, and enhanced its permeability, thereby increasing the effectiveness of liposomes as drug delivery systems [4, 72].
Considerable experience has been accumulated in using PEG-coated nanoparticles for systemic delivery. These systems help overcome biological barriers and are used to treat numerous diseases. At the same time, researchers carefully analyze both the various physicochemical parameters of PEG-coated nanoparticles (the molecular weight of PEG, its surface density, and the characteristics of the nanoparticle core) and the specifics of the administration regimen. In the study by Dunn et al. [73], the particles with different PEG surface densities were investigated; the particles were produced through the copolymerization of styrene with the PEG macromonomer PS-PEG (polystyrene–poly(ethylene glycol)). An in vivo study devoted to the biodistribution of PS-PEG particles after intravenous administration to rats demonstrated a relationship between PEG surface density and the length of time the particles remained in the bloodstream while evading the recognition by the reticuloendothelial system. The particles with a higher PEG surface density exhibited longer circulation times in the bloodstream.
A key factor determining the in vivo behavior of PEG carriers is their interaction with plasma proteins. This interaction determines how long the particles circulate in the bloodstream and how actively they are taken up by immune cells. Gref et al. [74] described the development of the so-called stealth particles, their cores consisted of a biodegradable polymer (polylactide — PLA, poly(lactide-co-glycolide — PLGA, or polycaprolactone — PCL), with PEG chains covalently attached to the core surface. The main objective of the study was to optimize the parameters of the “corona” (the thickness and density of the PEG layer) as well as the composition of the core in order to achieve two goals simultaneously: reduce particle uptake by phagocytic cells (i.e., decrease their recognition and capture by immune cells) and reduce the adsorption of blood plasma proteins. The detailed analysis revealed the optimal parameters for the PEG coating: the greatest reduction in protein adsorption was achieved with a PEG molecular weight of 5000 g/mol, while the threshold PEG content providing maximum resistance to adsorption was 2–5 wt% (a further increase in the PEG fraction produced no additional effect). Phagocytosis studies using chemiluminescence methods and zeta-potential measurements were in good agreement with these findings. It was established that a threshold PEG surface density was found to simultaneously provide effective steric stabilization and prevent particle uptake by polymorphonuclear neutrophils [74]. The study by Muralidharan et al. [75] demonstrated the preferential use of PEG 3000–PEG 5000 in the development of long-circulating nanoparticles.
Polyethylene glycol as a foundation for polymers-based solutions in regenerative medicine
PEG is known to serve as a base for creating specialized polymeric materials used to address a range of medical challenges. One of the most promising forms is biocompatible hydrogels, they are able to mimic the physical properties of living tissues and widely used in regenerative medicine to accelerate the healing of damaged organs and tissues. According to the definition approved by the International Union of Societies for Science and Engineering in Biomaterials, “regenerative medicine comprises methods for treating diseases, congenital conditions, or injuries by regenerating functional tissues or organ structures” [76]. One of the objectives of regenerative medicine is to create new tissues outside the body by combining biomaterials with living cells. To interact effectively with cells and stimulate tissue formation, the materials used must mimic the natural tissue environment and exhibit biological activity, which is crucial for maintaining cell adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation [77].
PEG-based materials are well suited to these tasks, since they can be deliberately modified to impart the desired biological properties. Owing to the flexibility of chemical structure, PEG-based materials can reproduce the key characteristics of the cellular microenvironment, including the mechanical, hydrophilic, and spatial parameters that are important for cell behavior.
In practice, PEG-based matrices have already demonstrated their effectiveness in forming various types of tissue. Such materials have been used to create the models of cartilage, bone, vascular, endometrial, liver, and cardiac tissue, as well as tumor tissue models [77–79]. For example, Betz et al. [80] presented a thermosensitive PEG gel — the biomaterial composed of 5-ethyl-5-(hydroxymethyl)-β,β-dimethyl-1,3-dioxane-2-ethanol diacrylate (EHD) and poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA) incorporating bone morphogenetic protein 2. The gel supported the growth of bone marrow stromal cells, resulting in their differentiation and deposition of bone matrix. The study by Fu et al. [81] showed a biodegradable triblock copolymer of poly(ethylene glycol)-poly(ε-caprolactone)-poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG-PCL-PEG, PECE) containing collagen and nanohydroxyapatite to direct bone-tissue regeneration. The resulting nanocomposites had a three-dimensional network structure and proved to be promising materials for injectable orthopedic applications and tissue engineering due to their favorable thermosensitive properties and injectability. Huang et al. [82] demonstrated that RGD peptide (arginine-glycine-aspartic acid) immobilized on a bioinert PEG nanostructure formed adhesion sites for osteoblasts and supported binding through integrin receptors. Quizon et al. [83] on a porcine model, obtained the evidence of robust vascularization and perfusion in the subcutaneous space induced by synthetic hydrogels based on a PEG macromer functionalized with 4 maleimide groups (PEG-4MAL) and delivering VEGF. The study by Kraehenbuehl et al. [84] demonstrated synthetic three-dimensional (3D) PEG-based hydrogels responsive to matrix metalloproteinases to be able to direct the in vitro differentiation of pluripotent embryonal carcinoma cells along the cardiac line. The authors concluded that this 3D system could serve as an alternative to natural matrices for creating cardiac tissue structures and could potentially be used in therapy.
It should be noted that PEG-based hydrogels themselves possess no biological activity, since they lack reactive sites providing the interactions with cellular receptors. At the same time, they can be modified by attaching peptide sequences and growth factors, which help cells attach and perform their functions by providing the necessary signals and regulation. As a result, the hydrogel becomes more than just a neutral 3D matrix; it becomes an environment that actively supports cell viability, adhesion, proliferation, and even differentiation [85].
Another application of PEG in regenerative medicine is using PEG not as a scaffold material but as an auxiliary agent for the PEGylation of matrix components intended for biomedical applications. The covalent attachment of PEG molecules to biopharmaceutical molecules is known to improve the pharmacological and therapeutic properties of proteins and other macromolecules. This approach is currently in high demand [46]. For example, FUD (functional upstream domain) peptide as an antifibrotic agent, and its PEG-modified form with improved pharmacokinetic properties are being used in experimental fibrosis models and in antifibrotic therapy [86]. PEGylation of nanomaterials has been effectively used for controlled drug delivery and regenerative therapy in retinal diseases. The process improves stability and reduces the immune response in the ocular environment, while peptide functionalization enables specific cellular targeting and minimizes inflammatory reactions [87]. Chu et al. [88] described the role of PEG as a linker that helps integrate graphene oxide and quercetin into a matrix. The hybrid scaffold based on a dermal matrix, PEGylated graphene oxide, and quercetin (GO-PEG/Que) offers multiple advantages, including biocompatibility with a cell-adhesive surface, which accelerates the attachment and proliferation of mesenchymal stem cells, as well as high stability and tunable conductive properties during wound healing in diabetic patients. According to the authors, the study opens new opportunities for developing GO-PEG-based hybrid collagen matrices for applications in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.
In our study [89], the composite designed to form a biopolymer hydrogel scaffold carrier, containing PEGylated plasma cryoprecipitate proteins and type I collagen, demonstrated favorable results in repairing an experimental full-thickness excisional wound in a pig. During the early stages of the regenerative process, the biopolymer hydrogel scaffold was shown to integrate into the tissue, promote cell recruitment, support cellular proliferative activity, and accelerate the maturation of granulation tissue. At later stages, the scaffold was also able to prevent scar tissue formation.
Thus, PEG-based materials remain a promising platform for tissue engineering: their tunable properties allow the matrix to be flexibly adapted to different tissue types and to specific research or therapeutic objectives.
Polyethylene glycol as a component of cosmetic and dermatological products
PEGs are frequently used in dermatological and cosmetic formulations. These polymers are also used in cosmetic products as surfactants, emulsifiers, cleansers, and skin-hydrating agents. They are added to creams, lotions, and cleansing formulations to improve the product sensory properties: creating a more pleasant texture, ensuring smooth application, and enhancing hydration [90].
Moreover, PEG can enhance the delivery of active ingredients into the skin. In anti-aging products, it acts as an effective carrier: it helps ingredients such as retinol and peptides to penetrate deeper layers of the skin and fully exert their effects. This increases the overall efficacy of the product and allows the desired cosmetic results to be achieved more quickly. PEG and its derivatives are generally considered safe to be used in cosmetics.
Polyethylene glycol as a preparatory agent for diagnostic procedures
In medicine, PEG is frequently used to prepare the bowel for diagnostic procedures. The use of an aqueous electrolyte PEG solution for bowel cleansing was first proposed by Davis et al. in 1980 [91]. The isotonic oral solution used by the authors was neither digested nor absorbed in the intestine. Currently, a therapeutic regimen involving 4 L of PEG is widely accepted for patient preparation before such procedures. PEG is an osmotic laxative that is not absorbed in the intestine. An important advantage of PEG preparations is that their use cause no significant changes in water and electrolyte balance [92].
PEGylation and legal regulation of PEGylated pharmaceuticals
The section considers the concept of PEGylation in greater detail from the perspective of the regulatory requirements applicable to PEGylated products, as well as the legal considerations concerning the use of PEGylated biopharmaceuticals.
PEGylation is the chemical modification of biomolecules through the attachment of one or more chains of activated PEG [62, 93, 94]. The substrates most commonly used for PEGylation include proteins, peptides, low-molecular-weight compounds, or oligonucleotides [31, 95], resulting in a new molecular structure, its physicochemical and physiological properties differing substantially from those of the original molecule [5]. Currently, PEGylation has evolved beyond a simple drug-delivery technology and has become an important tool for the targeted modification of pharmaceutical products. The approach can substantially improve the clinical efficacy of existing biopharmaceuticals [12, 29]. Following PEGylation, the molecule acquires several advantages: its pharmacokinetic properties improve (e.g., its half-life is extended and its clearance rate is reduced) and its pharmacodynamic characteristics are enhanced, including greater stability of action and more predictable effects [5, 46]. It enables to achieve a more pronounced therapeutic outcome.
One of significant advantages of PEGylated drugs is their ability to produce a sustained clinical effect at lower doses and with less frequent administration. Such approach improves patient quality of life by simplifying treatment regimens and reducing the overall time and cost of therapy [96].
From a contemporary legal perspective, PEGylated drugs are no longer assessed solely on the basis of their individual ingredients. Once a molecule is bound to a chemical component, the resulting conjugate becomes a new chemical entity, since the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of the conjugated component have been altered [45]. Accordingly, a PEGylated product should undergo all the necessary approval stages required for new medicinal products. The stability, toxicology, and biological fate of the PEGylated product must be established before it is placed on the market [45, 97]. The rapid growth in research in this field is expected to expand the range of PEGylated products available in the medical market. At the same time, it is emphasized that the regulatory framework should be adapted to reflect the advances in nanomedicine while ensuring patient safety [97, 98]. By 2022, 12 PEGylated biopharmaceutical products had been approved by the FDA in the United States demonstrating the clinical significance of the technology [46]. As of 2026, more than 30 types of PEGylated drugs are used in clinical practice [99], while many others are undergoing clinical trials. At present, more than 80 active clinical studies of such products are being conducted [10, 100–103].
In Russian legislation there is no separate federal law devoted exclusively to PEGylated drugs. In practice, however, the use of these drugs is regulated through the general rules governing the registration and description of medicinal products established by Decision No.18 of the Council of the Eurasian Economic Commission, dated February 21, 2025. The document amends the requirements for the instructions for medical use and the summary of product characteristics. It expressly provides that the specific provisions set forth in Appendix No.2 to these requirements should be taken into account for PEGylated drugs [104]. According to this appendix, when a PEGylated drug is registered in Russia (or in any other country of the Eurasian Economic Union), the composition of the drug should be described in detail, including the information about the attached PEG chain. Moreover, the PEG molecule attachment itself should be characterized in detail: the degree of modification is to be specified (i.e., how many PEG molecules are attached to each protein molecule), as well as the pattern of modification, including the specific sites on the protein wh ere the reaction occurred. The physicochemical, immunochemical, and biological properties of the resulting conjugate must also be described. Since PEGylation alters the properties of the molecule, a detailed description helps physicians and regulators better understand the drug profile, as well as its benefits and potential risks [27, 105, 106].
Conclusion
The review presents the information on the role of PEG and its derivatives in modern pharmaceutics and medicine. The analysis of PEG physicochemical properties — including the features of its chemical structure and the diversity of its derivatives classified by molecular weight, structural organization, and other parameters — provides a foundation for understanding the mechanisms underlying its broad practical application.
The range of medical applications of PEG demonstrates its versatility: it is used as a solvent and functional component in pharmaceutical formulations, as a key element in targeted drug-delivery systems and regenerative medicine solutions, in the manufacture of cosmetic and dermatological products, and in preparing patients for diagnostic procedures.
The regulatory aspects of using PEGylated drugs deserve particular attention. Compliance with the applicable legal and regulatory framework, including the provisions established by the decisions of the Council of the Eurasian Economic Commission is a mandatory condition for the development, registration, and safe use of these medicinal products.
Thus, PEG is a multifunctional tool in modern medicine. Its versatility results from the ability to tailor its properties through molecular weight, density, bond type, and combinations with other polymers.
Author contributions. All authors made equal contribution to writing the present paper.
Study funding. The work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation grant No.26-13-00582.
Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest related to the present study.
References
1. Hornsby B.D., Lee C.H., Steele C.A., Tuekpe J.K.K., Lim C.S. Therapeutic peptides and proteins: status and developments in drug delivery. J Control Release 2026; 394: 114895, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2026.114895.
2. Polyethylene glycol market (2026–2033). URL: https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/polyethylene-glycol-peg-market.
3. Polyethylene glycol market report. URL: https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/polyethylene-glycol-market-83158233.html.
4. Christoforou I., Kalatzis A., Siamidi A., Vlachou M., Pispas S., Pippa N. The ubiquitous use of polyethylene glycol in pharmaceutical design and development: technological aspects and future perspectives. Nanomaterials (Basel) 2025; 15(23): 1762, https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15231762.
5. Santhanakrishnan K.R., Koilpillai J., Narayanasamy D. PEGylation in pharmaceutical development: current status and emerging trends in macromolecular and immunotherapeutic drugs. Cureus 2024; 16(8): e66669, https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.66669.
6. Wang Z., Ye Q., Yu S., Akhavan B. Poly ethylene glycol (PEG)-based hydrogels for drug delivery in cancer therapy: a comprehensive review. Adv Healthc Mater 2023; 12(18): e2300105, https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202300105.
7. Moayedi S., Xia W., Lundergan L., Yuan H., Xu J. Zwitterionic polymers for biomedical applications: antimicrobial and antifouling strategies toward implantable medical devices and drug delivery. Langmuir 2024; 40(44): 23125–23145, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.4c02664.
8. Bento C., Katz M., Santos M.M.M., Afonso C.A.M. Striving for uniformity: a review on advances and challenges to achieve uniform polyethylene glycol. Org Process Res Dev 2024; 28(4): 860–890, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.3c00428.
9. Gabizon A.A., Gabizon-Peretz S., Modaresahmadi S., La-Beck N.M. Thirty years from FDA approval of PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil/Caelyx): an updated analysis and future perspective. BMJ Oncol 2025; 4(1): e000573, https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjonc-2024-000573.
10. Gao Y., Joshi M., Zhao Z., Mitragotri S. PEGylated therapeutics in the clinic. Bioeng Transl Med 2024; 9(1): e10600, https://doi.org/10.1002/btm2.10600.
11. Padín-González E., Lancaster P., Bottini M., Gasco P., Tran L., Fadeel B., Wilkins T., Monopoli M.P. Understanding the role and impact of poly (ethylene glycol) (PEG) on nanoparticle formulation: implications for COVID-19 vaccines. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2022; 10: 882363, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.882363.
12. Li C., Li T., Tian X., An W., Wang Z., Han B., Tao H., Wang J., Wang X. Research progress on the PEGylation of therapeutic proteins and peptides (TPPs). Front Pharmacol 2024; 15: 1353626, https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2024.1353626.
13. Herzberger J., Niederer K., Pohlit H., Seiwert J., Worm M., Wurm F.R., Frey H. Polymerization of ethylene oxide, propylene oxide, and other alkylene oxides: synthesis, novel polymer architectures, and bioconjugation. Chem Rev 2016; 116(4): 2170–2243, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00441.
14. Burggraef M.J., Oxley A., Zaidi N.A., Cutillas P.R., Gaffney P.R.J., Livingston A.G. Exactly defined molecular weight poly(ethylene glycol) allows for facile identification of PEGylation sites on proteins. Nat Commun 2024; 15(1): 9814, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-54076-6.
15. Shi D., Beasock D., Fessler A., Szebeni J., Ljubimova J.Y., Afonin K.A., Dobrovolskaia M.A. To PEGylate or not to PEGylate: immunological properties of nanomedicine's most popular component, polyethylene glycol and its alternatives. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2022; 180: 114079, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2021.114079.
16. Banerjee S.S., Aher N., Patil R., Khandare J. Poly(ethylene glycol)-prodrug conjugates: concept, design, and applications. J Drug Deliv 2012; 2012: 103973, https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/103973.
17. Belén L.H., Rangel-Yagui C.O., Beltrán Lissabet J.F., Effer B., Lee-Estevez M., Pessoa A., Castillo R.L., Farías J.G. From synthesis to characterization of site-selective PEGylated proteins. Front Pharmacol 2019; 10: 1450, https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2019.01450.
18. Makharadze D., Del Valle L.J., Katsarava R., Puiggalí J. The art of PEGylation: from simple polymer to sophisticated drug delivery system. Int J Mol Sci 2025; 26(7), https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26073102.
19. Turecek P.L., Bossard M.J., Schoetens F., Ivens I.A. PEGylation of biopharmaceuticals: a review of chemistry and nonclinical safety information of approved drugs. J Pharm Sci 2016; 105(2): 460–475, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xphs.2015.11.015.
20. Zuma L.K., Gasa N.L., Makhoba X.H., Pooe O.J. Protein PEGylation: navigating recombinant protein stability, aggregation, and bioactivity. Biomed Res Int 2022; 2022: 8929715, https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8929715.
21. Milla P., Dosio F., Cattel L. PEGylation of proteins and liposomes: a powerful and flexible strategy to improve the drug delivery. Curr Drug Metab 2012; 13(1): 105–119, https://doi.org/10.2174/138920012798356934.
22. Patel M., Park J.K., Jeong B. Rediscovery of poly(ethylene glycol)s as a cryoprotectant for mesenchymal stem cells. Biomater Res 2023; 27(1): 17, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40824-023-00356-z.
23. Roberts M.J., Bentley M.D., Harris J.M. Chemistry for peptide and protein PEGylation. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2002; 54(4): 459–476, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-409x(02)00022-4.
24. Ibrahim M., Ramadan E., Elsadek N.E., Emam S.E., Shimizu T., Ando H., Ishima Y., Elgarhy O.H., Sarhan H.A., Hussein A.K., Ishida T. Polyethylene glycol (PEG): the nature, immunogenicity, and role in the hypersensitivity of PEGylated products. J Control Release 2022; 351: 215–230, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.09.031.
25. Ivens I.A., Achanzar W., Baumann A., Brändli-Baiocco A., Cavagnaro J., Dempster M., Depelchin B.O., Rovira A.R., Dill-Morton L., Lane J.H., Reipert B.M., Salcedo T., Schweighardt B., Tsuruda L.S., Turecek P.L., Sims J. PEGylated biopharmaceuticals: current experience and considerations for nonclinical development. Toxicol Pathol 2015; 43(7): 959–983, https://doi.org/10.1177/0192623315591171.
26. López-Estevez A.M., Gref R., Alonso M.J. A journey through the history of PEGylated drug delivery nanocarriers. Drug Deliv Transl Res 2024; 14(8): 2026–2031, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13346-024-01608-8.
27. Gonçalves J., Caliceti P. Optimizing pharmacological and immunological properties of therapeutic proteins through PEGylation: investigating key parameters and their impact. Drug Des Devel Ther 2024; 18: 5041–5062, https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S481420.
28. Jiang K., Tian K., Yu Y., Wu E., Yang M., Pan F., Qian J., Zhan C. Kupffer cells determine intrahepatic traffic of PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin. Nat Commun 2024; 15(1): 6136, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-50568-7.
29. Fornasari D.M.M. PEGylated proteins: how much does molecular weight matter? Clin Pharmacokinet 2025; 64(11): 1587–1597, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40262-025-01568-3.
30. Chen B.M., Cheng T.L., Roffler S.R. Polyethylene glycol immunogenicity: theoretical, clinical, and practical aspects of anti-polyethylene glycol antibodies. ACS Nano 2021; 15(9): 14022–14048, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.1c05922.
31. Lu X., Zhang K. PEGylation of therapeutic oligonucletides: from linear to highly branched PEG architectures. Nano Res 2018; 11(10): 5519–5534, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-018-2131-8.
32. Santos J.H.P.M., Torres-Obreque K.M., Meneguetti G.P., Amaro B.P., Rangel-Yagui C.O. Protein PEGylation for the design of biobetters: from reaction to purification processes. Braz J Pharm Sci 2018; 54(Special): e01009, https://doi.org/10.1590/s2175-97902018000001009.
33. Kim J., Kong Y.P., Niedzielski S.M., Singh R.K., Putnam A.J., Shikanov A. Characterization of the crosslinking kinetics of multi-arm poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels formed via Michael-type addition. Soft Matter 2016; 12(7): 2076–2085, https://doi.org/10.1039/c5sm02668g.
34. Adkins C.E., Nounou M.I., Hye T., Mohammad A.S., Terrell-Hall T., Mohan N.K., Eldon M.A., Hoch U., Lockman P.R. NKTR-102 efficacy versus irinotecan in a mouse model of brain metastases of breast cancer. BMC Cancer 2015; 15: 685, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1672-4.
35. Garrett C.R., Bekaii-Saab T.S., Ryan T., Fisher G.A., Clive S., Kavan P., Shacham-Shmueli E., Buchbinder A., Goldberg R.M. Randomized phase 2 study of PEGylated SN-38 (EZN-2208) or irinotecan plus cetuximab in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Cancer 2013; 119(24): 4223–4230, https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.28358.
36. Charych D.H., Hoch U., Langowski J.L., Lee S.R., Addepalli M.K., Kirk P.B., Sheng D., Liu X., Sims P.W., VanderVeen L.A., Ali C.F., Chang T.K., Konakova M., Pena R.L., Kanhere R.S., Kirksey Y.M., Ji C., Wang Y., Huang J., Sweeney T.D., Kantak S.S., Doberstein S.K. NKTR-214, an engineered cytokine with biased IL2 receptor binding, increased tumor exposure, and marked efficacy in mouse tumor models. Clin Cancer Res 2016; 22(3): 680–690, https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-1631.
37. Munasinghe A., Mathavan A., Mathavan A., Lin P., Colina C.M. Atomistic insight towards the impact of polymer architecture and grafting density on structure-dynamics of PEGylated bovine serum albumin and their applications. J Chem Phys 2021; 154(7): 075101, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0038306.
38. Dozier J.K., Distefano M.D. Site-specific PEGylation of therapeutic proteins. Int J Mol Sci 2015; 16(10): 25831–25864, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms161025831.
39. Pfister D., Morbidelli M. Process for protein PEGylation. J Control Release 2014; 180: 134–149, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.02.002.
40. Swierczewska M., Lee K.C., Lee S. What is the future of PEGylated therapies? Expert Opin Emerg Drugs 2015; 20(4): 531–536, https://doi.org/10.1517/14728214.2015.1113254.
41. Sharma A.R., Kundu S.K., Nam J.S., Sharma G., Priya Doss C.G., Lee S.S., Chakraborty C. Next generation delivery system for proteins and genes of therapeutic purpose: why and how? Biomed Res Int 2014; 2014: 327950, https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/327950.
42. Kumar V., Barwal A., Sharma N., Mir D.S., Kumar P., Kumar V. Therapeutic proteins: developments, progress, challenges, and future perspectives. 3 Biotech 2024; 14(4): 112, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-024-03958-z.
43. Veronese F.M., Mero A., Pasut G. Protein PEGylation, basic science and biological applications. In: Veronese F.M. (eds). PEGylated protein drugs: basic science and clinical applications. Birkhäuser Basel; 2009; p. 11–31, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7643-8679-5_2.
44. Bonora G.M., Drioli S. Reactive PEGs for protein conjugation. In: Veronese F.M. (eds). PEGylated protein drugs: basic science and clinical applications. Milestones in drug therapy. Birkhäuser Basel; 2009; p. 33–45, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7643-8679-5_3.
45. Kolate A., Baradia D., Patil S., Vhora I., Kore G., Misra A. PEG — a versatile conjugating ligand for drugs and drug delivery systems. J Control Release 2014; 192: 67–81, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.06.046.
46. Gundecha S., Shirolkar S., Deshkar S., Chitlange S., Shewale S., Jagtap R.A. A review on impact of PEGylation on biopharmaceuticals. International Journal of Health Sciences 2022; 6(S3): 6622–6634, https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6ns3.7477.
47. Gupta V., Bhavanasi S., Quadir M., Singh K., Ghosh G., Vasamreddy K., Ghosh A., Siahaan T.J., Banerjee S., Banerjee S.K. Protein PEGylation for cancer therapy: bench to bedside. J Cell Commun Signal 2019; 13(3): 319–330, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12079-018-0492-0.
48. Fee C.J., Van Alstine J.M. Purification of PEGylated proteins. In: Janson J.-C. (eds). Protein purification. 2011; p. 339–362, https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470939932.ch14.
49. Mosmann T. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods 1983; 65(1–2): 55–63, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1759(83)90303-4.
50. Zhang C., Desai R., Perez-Luna V., Karuri N. PEGylation of lysine residues improves the proteolytic stability of fibronectin while retaining biological activity. Biotechnol J 2014; 9(8): 1033–1043, https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201400115.
51. Rajender Reddy K., Modi M.W., Pedder S. Use of peginterferon alfa-2a (40 KD) (Pegasys®) for the treatment of hepatitis C. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2002; 54(4): 571–586, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-409x(02)00028-5.
52. Dunne M., Zheng J., Rosenblat J., Jaffray D.A., Allen C. APN/CD13-targeting as a strategy to alter the tumor accumulation of liposomes. J Control Release 2011; 154(3): 298–305, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.05.022.
53. Zhu L., Kate P., Torchilin V.P. Matrix metalloprotease 2-responsive multifunctional liposomal nanocarrier for enhanced tumor targeting. ACS Nano 2012; 6(4): 3491–3498, https://doi.org/10.1021/nn300524f.
54. Kumari M., Sahni G., Datta S. Development of site-specific PEGylated granulocyte colony stimulating factor with prolonged biological activity. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2020; 8: 572077, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.572077.
55. Doherty D.H., Rosendahl M.S., Smith D.J., Hughes J.M., Chlipala E.A., Cox G.N. Site-specific PEGylation of engineered cysteine analogues of recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor. Bioconjug Chem 2005; 16(5): 1291–1298, https://doi.org/10.1021/bc050172r.
56. Ramirez-Paz J., Saxena M., Delinois L.J., Joaquín-Ovalle F.M., Lin S., Chen Z., Rojas-Nieves V.A., Griebenow K. Thiol-maleimide poly(ethylene glycol) crosslinking of L-asparaginase subunits at recombinant cysteine residues introduced by mutagenesis. PLoS One 2018; 13(7): e0197643, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197643.
57. Luo S., Lu X., Liu C., Zhong J., Zhou L., Chen T. Site specific PEGylation of β-lactoglobulin at glutamine residues and its influence on conformation and antigenicity. Food Res Int 2019; 123: 623–630, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2019.05.038.
58. Sakane T., Pardridge W.M. Carboxyl-directed PEGylation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor markedly reduces systemic clearance with minimal loss of biologic activity. Pharm Res 1997; 14(8): 1085–1091, https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1012117815460.
59. Zaghmi A., Mendez-Villuendas E., Greschner A.A., Liu J.Y., de Haan H.W., Gauthier M.A. Mechanisms of activity loss for a multi-PEGylated protein by experiment and simulation. Mater Today Chem 2019; 12: 121–131, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtchem.2018.12.007.
60. Wang B., Cao Y., Chi S., Lou D. A PEGylation technology of L-asparaginase with monomethoxy polyethylene glycol-propionaldehyde. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung C 2012; 67(5–6): 312-318, https://doi.org/10.1515/znc-2012-5-611.
61. Benet L.Z. The role of BCS (biopharmaceutics classification system) and BDDCS (biopharmaceutics drug disposition classification system) in drug development. J Pharm Sci 2013; 102(1): 34–42, https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.23359.
62. D’souza A.A., Shegokar R. Polyethylene glycol (PEG): a versatile polymer for pharmaceutical applications. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2016; 13(9): 1257–1275, https://doi.org/10.1080/17425247.2016.1182485.
63. Werner M.E., Cummings N.D., Sethi M., Wang E.C., Sukumar R., Moore D.T., Wang A.Z. Preclinical evaluation of Genexol-PM, a nanoparticle formulation of paclitaxel, as a novel radiosensitizer for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2013; 86(3): 463–468, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.02.009.
64. Krasnyuk (Jr.) I.I., Naryshkin S.R., Krasnyuk I.I., Belyatskaya A.V., Stepanova O.I., Bobrov I.S., Yankova V.G., Rau J.V., Vorobiev A.N. Effect of solid dispersions on the solubility of metronidazole. Pharmacy & Pharmacology 2021; 9(3): 195–204, https://doi.org/10.19163/2307-9266-2021-9-3-195-204.
65. Tambosi G., Coelho P.F., Luciano S., Lenschow I.C.S., Zétola M., Stulzer H.K., Pezzini B.R. Challenges to improve the biopharmaceutical properties of poorly water-soluble drugs and the application of the solid dispersion technology. Matéria (Rio de Janeiro) 2018; 23(4). https://doi.org/10.1590/s1517-707620180004.0558.
66. Le Khanh H.P., Haimhoffer Á., Nemes D., Józsa L., Vasvári G., Budai I., Bényei A., Ujhelyi Z., Fehér P., Bácskay I. Effect of molecular weight on the dissolution profiles of peg solid dispersions containing ketoprofen. Polymers (Basel) 2023; 15(7), https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15071758.
67. Silva Freitas D.d., Abrahão-Neto J. Batch purification of high-purity lysozyme from egg white and characterization of the enzyme modified by PEGylation. Pharm Biol 2010; 48(5): 554–562, https://doi.org/10.3109/13880200903196859.
68. Porfiryeva N.N., Moustafine R.I., Khutoryanskiy V.V. PEGylated systems in pharmaceutics. Polym Sci Ser 2020; 61(1): 62–74, https://doi.org/10.1134/S181123822001004X.
69. Nsairat H., Khater D., Sayed U., Odeh F., Al Bawab A., Alshaer W. Liposomes: structure, composition, types, and clinical applications. Heliyon 2022; 8(5): e09394, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09394.
70. Raikov A.O., Hashem A., Baryshnikova M.A. Liposomes as target delivery of antitumor drugs. Russian Journal of Biotherapy 2016; 15(2): 90–96, https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9784-2016-15-2-90-96.
71. Jyothirmayi P., Anusha A., Srinivasarao N., Nandini Y., Kavya A., Jayalakshmi K. A review of targetted drug delivery systems — a new era of drug carriers in cancer therapy. Indo Am J P Sci 2024; 11(12): 525–542.
72. Minamisakamoto T., Nishiguchi S., Hashimoto K., Ogawara K.I., Maruyama M., Higaki K. Sequential administration of PEG-Span 80 niosome enhances anti-tumor effect of doxorubicin-containing PEG liposome. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2021; 169: 20–28, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2021.08.013.
73. Dunn S.E., Brindley A., Davis S.S., Davies M.C., Illum L. Polystyrene-poly (ethylene glycol) (PS-PEG2000) particles as model systems for site specific drug delivery. 2. The effect of PEG surface density on the in vitro cell interaction and in vivo biodistribution. Pharm Res 1994; 11(7): 1016–1022, https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1018939521589.
74. Gref R., Lück M., Quellec P., Marchand M., Dellacherie E., Harnisch S., Blunk T., Müller R.H. ‘Stealth’ corona-core nanoparticles surface modified by polyethylene glycol (PEG): influences of the corona (PEG chain length and surface density) and of the core composition on phagocytic uptake and plasma protein adsorption. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2000; 18(3-4): 301–313, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0927-7765(99)00156-3.
75. Muralidharan P., Mallory E., Malapit M., Hayes D., Mansour H.M. Inhalable PEGylated phospholipid nanocarriers and PEGylated therapeutics for respiratory delivery as aerosolized colloidal dispersions and dry powder inhalers. Pharmaceutics 2014; 6(2): 333–353, https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics6020333.
76. Definitions of biomaterials for the twenty-first century. Williams D., Zhang X. (eds). Elsevier; 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/c2018-0-02529-3.
77. Moore E.M., West J.L. Bioactive poly(ethylene glycol) acrylate hydrogels for regenerative engineering. Regen Eng Transl Med 2018; 5(2): 167–179, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40883-018-0074-y.
78. De Vriendt S., Casares C.M., Rocha S., Vankelecom H. Matrix scaffolds for endometrium-derived organoid models. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2023; 14: 1240064, https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1240064.
79. Cheng H., Yang A., Lv G., Zheng H., Li H. Polyethylene glycol (PEG)-based wet-adhesive absorbable bone wax for osseous hemostasis and repair. Int J Mol Sci 2025; 27(1): 276, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27010276.
80. Betz M.W., Yeatts A.B., Richbourg W.J., Caccamese J.F., Coletti D.P., Falco E.E., Fisher J.P. Macroporous hydrogels upregulate osteogenic signal expression and promote bone regeneration. Biomacromolecules 2010; 11(5): 1160–1168, https://doi.org/10.1021/bm100061z.
81. Fu S., Guo G., Gong C., Zeng S., Liang H., Luo F., Zhang X., Zhao X., Wei Y., Qian Z. Injectable biodegradable thermosensitive hydrogel composite for orthopedic tissue engineering. 1. Preparation and characterization of nanohydroxyapatite/poly(ethylene glycol)-poly(epsilon-caprolactone)-poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogel nanocomposites. J Phys Chem B 2009; 113(52): 16518–16525, https://doi.org/10.1021/jp907974d.
82. Huang J., Grater S.V., Corbellini F., Rinck S., Bock E., Kemkemer R., Kessler H., Ding J., Spatz J.P. Impact of order and disorder in RGD nanopatterns on cell adhesion. Nano Lett 2009; 9(3): 1111–1116, https://doi.org/10.1021/nl803548b.
83. Quizon M.J., Deppen J.N., Barber G.F., Kalelkar P.P., Coronel M.M., Levit R.D., Garcia A.J. VEGF-delivering PEG hydrogels promote vascularization in the porcine subcutaneous space. J Biomed Mater Res A 2024; 112(6): 866–880, https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.37666.
84. Kraehenbuehl T.P., Zammaretti P., Van der Vlies A.J., Schoenmakers R.G., Lutolf M.P., Jaconi M.E., Hubbell J.A. Three-dimensional extracellular matrix-directed cardioprogenitor differentiation: systematic modulation of a synthetic cell-responsive PEG-hydrogel. Biomaterials 2008; 29(18): 2757–2766, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.03.016.
85. Zhu J. Bioactive modification of poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2010; 31(17): 4639–4656, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.02.044.
86. Lee H.J., Tomasini-Johansson B.R., Gupta N., Kwon G.S. Fibronectin-targeted FUD and PEGylated FUD peptides for fibrotic diseases. J Control Release 2023; 360: 69–81, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2023.06.008.
87. Dashti R., Safaei F., Sadeghian G., Hosseini S.A., Salimibani M. Peptide-functionalized nanomaterials for controlled drug delivery and regenerative therapies in retinal diseases. J Biomater Appl 2026; 40(10): 1235–1262, https://doi.org/10.1177/08853282251395196.
88. Chu J., Shi P., Yan W., Fu J., Yang Z., He C., Deng X., Liu H. PEGylated graphene oxide-mediated quercetin-modified collagen hybrid scaffold for enhancement of MSCs differentiation potential and diabetic wound healing. Nanoscale 2018; 10(20): 9547–9560, https://doi.org/10.1039/c8nr02538j.
89. Egorikhina M.N., Timofeeva L.B., Rubtsova Y.P., Farafontova E.A., Linkova D.D., Charykova I.N., Ryabkov M.G., Ezhevskaya A.A., Levicheva E.A., Aleynik D.Y. Study of the effectiveness of skin restoration using a biopolymer hydrogel scaffold with encapsulated mesenchymal stem cells. Int J Mol Sci 2025; 26(16): 7840, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26167840.
90. Jang H.J., Shin C.Y., Kim K.B. Safety evaluation of polyethylene glycol (PEG) compounds for cosmetic use. Toxicol Res 2015; 31(2): 105–136, https://doi.org/10.5487/TR.2015.31.2.105.
91. Davis G.R., Santa Ana C.A., Morawski S.G., Fordtran J.S. Development of a lavage solution associated with minimal water and electrolyte absorption or secretion. Gastroenterology 1980; 78(5): 991–995. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-5085(80)90781-7.
92. Shekunova E.V., Mazukina E.V., Vavilova V.A., Kashkin V.V., Balabanyan V.Yu., Fazylov M.F., Makarova M.N., Makarov V.G. Experimental study of the efficacy and safety of a new PEG-based laxative. Safety and Risk of Pharmacotherapy 2022; 10(2): 176–195, https://doi.org/10.30895/2312-7821-2022-10-2-176-195.
93. Damiri F., Simińska-Stanny J., Rasoulian F., Pinal C., Kaczmarek-Szczepanska B., Patel C.D., Patel H.M., Papadimitirou S.A., Jaradat E., Paiva-Santos A.C., Okoro O.V., Shavandi A., Berrada M., Vora L.K., Fatimi A. Emerging trends in polysaccharide-based smart PEGylated hydrogels for biomedical applications. Carbohydr Polym 2026; 375: 124707, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2025.124707.
94. Piñol-Cancer M., Fernández-Méndez L., Carrillo-Romero J., Urkola-Arsuaga A., Azkargorta M., Elortza F., Goñi-de-Cerio F., García-Mouton C., de Alejo C.M., Ismalaj E., Cañadas O., Pérez-Gil J., Ruíz-Cabello J., Carregal-Romero S. The role of PEGylation in the pulmonary delivery of antifibrotic liposomal therapies. J Control Release 2025; 386: 114134, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2025.114134.
95. PEGylated protein drugs: basic science and clinical applications. Francesco M. (eds). Springer Nature; 2009.
96. Bailon P., Won C.Y. PEG-modified biopharmaceuticals. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2009; 6(1): 1–16, https://doi.org/10.1517/17425240802650568.
97. Stucchi F., Li M., Castellano G., Cellesi F. Regulatory framework for polymer-based nanotherapeutics in clinical translation. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2026; 14: 1735885, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2026.1735885.
98. Chikara R., Chaudhary A., Goswami H., Rana D., Nagar T., Sachdeva M., Sharma S. Cancer nanomedicine: scientific advances, clinical translation, regulatory frameworks, and safety perspectives. Int J Pharm Chem Anal 2026; 13(1): 36–44, https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijpca.16080.1773817035.
99. Jan N., Rejili M. Nature-inspired alternatives to PEG for next-generation long-circulating nanocarriers. Int J Nanomedicine 2026; 21: 618454, https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S618454.
100. Wong G.L., Yuen M.F., Lin B., Douglas M.W., Hu P., Xie Q., Lv F., Tak W.Y., Leerapun A., Kim D.J., Tangkijvanich P., Lim Y.S., Dai C.Y., O'Beirne J., Weltman M., Khemnark S., Piratvisuth T., Manasirisuk W., Chen X., Liu C.J., Heo J., Lee J., Niu J., Kumar R., Kumar R., Zhu C., Cao K., Tian A., Chen X., Zhu Q., Margolis D., Jia J., Hong Z. Elebsiran and PEG-IFNα for chronic hepatitis B infection: a partially randomized, open-label, phase 2 trial. Nat Med 2026; 32(1): 151–159, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-04049-z.
101. Buti M., Heo J., Tanaka Y., Andreone P., Atsukawa M., Cabezas J., Chak E., Coffin C.S., Fujiwara K., Gankina N., Gordon S.C., Janczewska E., Komori A., Lampertico P., McPherson S., Morozov V., Plesniak R., Poulin S., Ryan P., Sagalova O., Sheng G., Voloshina N., Xie Q., Yim H.J., Dixon S., Paff M., Felton L., Lee M., Greene T., Lim J., Lakshminarayanan D., McGonagle G., Plein H., Youssef A.S., Elston R., Kendrick S., Theodore D. Sequential Peg-IFN after bepirovirsen may reduce post-treatment relapse in chronic hepatitis B. J Hepatol 2025; 82(2): 222–234, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2024.08.010.
102. Lampertico P., Anolli M.P., Roulot D., Wedemeyer H. Antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis delta: new insights from clinical trials and real-life studies. Gut 2025; 74(5): 853–862, https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2024-332597.
103. ClinicalTrials.gov. URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/.
104. Decision of the Council of the Eurasian Economic Commission No.18 dated February 21, 2025, “On amending the requirements for the instructions for medical use of a medicinal product and the summary of product characteristics for a medicinal product for medical use”.
105. Dreier P., Matthes R., Fuß F., Schmidt J., Schulz D., Linden G.M., Barent R.D., Schüttner S., Neun B.W., Cedrone E., Dobrovolskaia M.A., Bros M., Frey H. Isomerization of poly(ethylene glycol): a strategy for the evasion of anti-PEG antibody recognition. J Am Chem Soc 2025; 147(25): 21538–21548, https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5c02716.
106. Schmidt J., Bockhard C., Simon L., Linden G.M., Scheiger J.M., Frey H. From PEG to randomized PEG: a macromolecular strategy tackling PEG immunogenicity. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2026; 238: 115943, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2026.115943.