Functional Anatomy of the Sheep Heart as a Model for Testing Cardiovascular Devices

The aim of the study is to assess the availability of this animal model for preclinical testing of implantable cardiovascular devices by studying numerical anatomical and functional characteristics of the ovine heart and to establish their differences from those of the human heart.

Materials and Methods. The study was performed on 17 healthy crossbred Romanov sheep weighing 20–29 kg in group 1 (n=7) and 30–43 kg in group 2 (n=10). All animals underwent echocardiography examination on the Philips CX-50 apparatus (revision 3.1.2; Philips, Netherlands) with a sector-phased S5-1 sensor from the right parasternal projection (long and short axis) to determine the heart rate, right ventricular wall thickness in diastole, right and left ventricular end-diastolic dimensions (RV EDD and LV EDD), left ventricular end-systolic dimension (LV ESD), interventricular septum (IVS) thickness in systole and diastole, left ventricular posterior wall thickness in systole and diastole.

Functional parameters of the left ventricle (left ventricle end-systolic and end-diastolic volumes (LV ESV and LV EDV), ejection fraction and shortening fraction) were calculated using the modified Simpson method built into the echocardiography software. The diameter of the mitral annulus and the characteristics of the aortic root were also measured: the diameters of the aortic valve, Valsalva sinuses, and sinotubular junction, as well as the height of the aortic root from the fibrous ring to the line of the sinotubular junction. Direct measurements of the ascending aorta and pulmonary artery diameters, intercommissural distances, and the height of the aortic valve leaflets were performed after autopsy.

Results. A number of anatomical and functional parameters of the sheep heart such as ejection fraction, myocardium thickness, LV EDD and LV ESD, aorta, and pulmonary artery diameters, have been established to be close to those of the human heart. At the same time, LV EDV and LV ESV of the sheep are significantly lower than in humans, even in relation to the body surface area, and the average mitral valve diameter is larger. Despite the same diameters of the aortic valve, Valsalva sinuses, and sinotubular junction, the structures of the ovine and human aortic roots are different: the sheep root features a smaller height and intercommissural distances of the cusps. In addition, some differences were found in the arrangement of the cusps in relation to the valve axis: the intercommissural distance of the right coronary leaflet was almost 2 times greater than the similar indicator of the left coronary leaflet.

Most anatomical and functional parameters have not shown any correlation with the animals’ body weight. Only in group 2, a significant positive correlation between body weight and the height of the aortic valve leaflets was found.

Conclusion. The anatomical and functional characteristics of the sheep heart are close but not identical to human hearts. The sheep is a valid experimental model for preclinical testing of implantable cardiovascular devices, but a successful experiment requires careful screening of animals with echocardiographic assessment of the target zone parameters and selection of the appropriate device size.

1. Blaser M.C., Kraler S., Lüscher T.F., Aikawa E. Multi-omics approaches to define calcific aortic valve disease pathogenesis. Circ Res 2021; 128(9): 1371–1397, https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.120.317979.
2. Bouma B.J., Mulder B.J. Changing landscape of congenital heart disease. Circ Res 2017; 120(6): 908–922, https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.309302.
3. Karimov J.H., Moazami N., Kobayashi M., Sale S., Such K., Byram N., Sunagawa G., Horvath D., Gao S., Kuban B., Golding L.A., Fukamachi K. First report of 90-day support of 2 calves with a continuous-flow total artificial heart. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015; 150(3): 687–693.e1, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.06.023.
4. Rusakova Y.L., Grankin D.S., Podolskaya K.S., Zhuravleva I.Y. Pigs as models to test cardiovascular devices. Biomedicines 2024; 12(6): 1245, https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12061245.
5. Barbarash L.S., Klyshnikov K.Yu., Haes B.L., Halivopulo I.K., Stasev A.N., Krutitsky S.S., Borisenko D.V., Sitnikov M.A., Ivanova A.V., Kudryavtsev Yu.A., Kokorin S.G., Evtushenko A.V., Ovcharenko E.A. First experience of sutureless redo on mitral valve using “valve-in-valve” method: two-stage implantation on a large animal. Byulleten’ eksperimental’noy biologii i meditsiny 2019; 168(12): 783–787.
6. Kim D.H., Morris B., Guerrero J.L., Sullivan S.M., Hung J., Levine R.A. Ovine model of ischemic mitral regurgitation. Methods Mol Biol 2018; 1816: 295–308, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-8597-5_23.
7. Van Hoof L., Claus P., Jones E.A.V., Meuris B., Famaey N., Verbrugghe P., Rega F. Back to the root: a large animal model of the Ross procedure. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2021; 10(4): 444–453, https://doi.org/10.21037/acs-2020-rp-21.
8. Sampath S., Klimas M., Feng D., Baumgartner R., Manigbas E., Liang A.L., Evelhoch J.L., Chin C.L. Characterization of regional left ventricular function in nonhuman primates using magnetic resonance imaging biomarkers: a test-retest repeatability and inter-subject variability study. PLoS One 2015; 10(5): e0127947, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127947.
9. Cai J., Huang H., Zhou Y., Mei Y., Shao J., Wang Y. A new type of aortic valved stent with good stability and no influence on coronary artery. J Cardiothorac Surg 2013; 8: 210, https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-8090-8-210.
10. Joudinaud T.M., Flecher E.M., Curry J.W., Kegel C.L., Weber P.A., Duran C.M. Sutureless stented aortic valve implantation under direct vision: lessons from a negative experience in sheep. J Card Surg 2007; 22(1): 13–17, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8191.2007.00337.x.
11. Bai Y., Zong G.J., Wang Y.Y., Jiang H.B., Li W.P., Wu H., Zhao X.X., Qin Y.W. Percutaneous aortic valve replacement using a W-model valved stent: a preliminary feasibility study in sheep. Chin Med J (Engl) 2009; 122(6): 655–658.
12. Acorda J.A., Pajas A.M.G. M-mode echocardiographic values in male and female Philippine sheep (Ovis aries) (Artiodactyla: Bovidae) by age and status of lactation and pregnancy. Philipp J Vet Med 2015; 52(1): 11–20.
13. Hong T., Maish M.S., Cohen J., Fitzpatrick P., Bert A.A., Harper J.S. 3rd, Fang D., Hoffman-Kim D., Hopkins R.A. Reproducible echocardiography in juvenile sheep and its application in the evaluation of a pulmonary valve homograft implant. Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci 2000; 39(5): 20–25.
14. Vloumidi E.I., Fthenakis G.C. Ultrasonographic examination of the heart in sheep. Small Ruminant Research 2017; 152: 119–127, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2016.12.019.
15. Poser H., Semplicini L., De Benedictis G.M., Gerardi G., Contiero B., Maschietto N., Valerio E., Milanesi O., Semplicini A., Bernardini D. Two-dimensional, M-mode and Doppler-derived echocardiographic parameters in sedated healthy growing female sheep. Lab Anim 2013; 47(3): 194–202, https://doi.org/10.1177/0023677213486895.
16. Boon J.A. Two-dimensional and M-mode echocardiography for the small animal practitioner. Ames, Iowa: John Wiley & Sons Inc; 2017.
17. Onkologiya melkikh domashnikh zhivotnykh [Oncology of small domestic animals]. Pod red. Trofimtsova D.V., Vilkovyskogo I.F. [Trofimtsov D.V., Vilkovyskiy I.F. (editors)]. Moscow: Izdatel’skiy dom “Nauchnaya biblioteka”; 2017.
18. Lang R.M., Badano L.P., Mor-Avi V., Afilalo J., Armstrong A., Ernande L., Flachskampf F.A., Foster E., Goldstein S.A., Kuznetsova T., Lancellotti P., Muraru D., Picard M.H., Rietzschel E.R., Rudski L., Spencer K.T., Tsang W., Voigt J.U. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2015; 28(1): 1–39.e14, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2014.10.003.
19. Petersen S.E., Khanji M.Y., Plein S., Lancellotti P., Bucciarelli-Ducci C. European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging expert consensus paper: a comprehensive review of cardiovascular magnetic resonance normal values of cardiac chamber size and aortic root in adults and recommendations for grading severity. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2019; 20(12): 1321–1331, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jez232.
20. Vandroux D., Houehanou Y.C., Magne J., Saka D., Sonou A., Amidou S., Houinato D., Preux P.M., Aboyans V., Lacroix P. Normal reference values of cardiac chamber sizes and functional parameters in a beninese community population: the TAHES study. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2023; 39(9): 1729–1739, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-023-02892-0.
21. Ricci F., Aung N., Gallina S., Zemrak F., Fung K., Bisaccia G., Paiva J.M., Khanji M.Y., Mantini C., Palermi S., Lee A.M., Piechnik S.K., Neubauer S., Petersen S.E. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance reference values of mitral and tricuspid annular dimensions: the UK Biobank cohort. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2020; 23(1): 5, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-020-00688-y.
22. Beck L., Mohamed A.A., Strugnell W.E., Bartlett H., Rodriguez V., Hamilton-Craig C., Slaughter R.E. MRI measurements of the thoracic aorta and pulmonary artery. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2018; 62(1): 64–71, https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.12637
23. Matsushima S., Karliova I., Gauer S., Miyahara S., Schäfers H.J. Geometry of cusp and root determines aortic valve function. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2020; 36(Suppl 1): 64–70, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-019-00813-2.
24. Svedenhag J., Larsson T.P., Lindqvist P., Olsson A., Rythén Alder E. Individual reference values for 2D echocardiographic measurements. The Stockholm — Umeå Study. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 2015; 35(4): 275–282, https://doi.org/10.1111/cpf.12161.
25. Wenzel J.P., Petersen E., Nikorowitsch J., Senftinger J., Sinning C., Theissen M., Petersen J., Reichenspurner H., Girdauskas E. Transthoracic echocardiographic reference values of the aortic root: results from the Hamburg City Health Study. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2021; 37(12): 3513–3524, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-021-02354-5.
26. Jazwiec T., Malinowski M., Proudfoot A.G., Eberhart L., Langholz D., Schubert H., Wodarek J., Timek T.A. Tricuspid valvular dynamics and 3-dimensional geometry in awake and anesthetized sheep. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2018; 156(4): 1503–1511, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.04.065.
27. Odinokova S.N., Nikolenko V.N., Komarov R.N., Vinokurov I.A., Mnatsakanyan G.V., Belkharoeva R.Kh. The correlations of morphometric parameters of structures of the aortic root having practical significance in the surgical correction of the aortic valve. Morphological newsletter 2020; 28(1): 30–36, https://doi.org/10.20340/mv-mn.2020.28(1):30-36.

Rusakova Y.L., Zhuravleva I.Yu. Functional Anatomy of the Sheep Heart as a Model for Testing Cardiovascular Devices. Sovremennye tehnologii v medicine 2025; 17(2): 13, https://doi.org/10.17691/stm2025.17.2.02